Jeff Matthews

Aug 12, 20126 min

A Tale of Two Retailers

We present below excerpts from analyst
 

 
presentations by two retailers.

The first is an old, well-known department
 

 
store chain, and the presentation was made last September, when its long-time
 

 
CEO spent an hour or so ruminating about the transformation of his company.

The second is more recent—like, this past Friday.

And it’s by JC Penney, or “JCP” as its new-age
 

 
executives insist on calling it—a misguided nod to the company’s stock ticker,
 

 
which seems to be the one thing those executives understand about the company
 

 
and its now-muddied 110-year old relationship with the American consumer…a
 

 
relationship that won’t be getting any better any time soon so long as its
 

 
executives insist on referring to a stock ticker that 98% of Penney’s customers
 

 
wouldn’t recognize if you tattooed it on their foreheads.

After all, did Steve Jobs walk around talk
 

 
about the great things “AAPL” was creating?
 
Does Coke run ads saying, “Enjoy a KO Today”? Do Wal-Mart greeters say, “Welcome to WMT” to
 

 
the overburdened mothers and their screaming toddlers as they begin the hair-pulling
 

 
search for the day’s bargains?

No they do not. But Penney executives would.

Worse still, the company runs newspaper ads
 

 
with no identification except “JCP” on the page. And
 

 
TV ads with only a “JCP” logo on the screen.
 
It’s no wonder the company’s sales collapsed 21% last quarter.

But if you’re expecting ex-Apple retail genius
 

 
Ron Johnson to bend a little on the “JCP” thing, well that’s not going to
 

 
happen, if last Friday’s earnings call was any indication—but we’re getting
 

 
ahead of ourselves.

The point here is to contrast Penney’s Friday
 

 
morning transcript detailing its current “transformation” with last year’s
 

 
presentation from another, larger department store—we’ll call it “XYZ” for
 

 
now—describing its own “transformation.”

If you
 

 
can guess what company “XYZ” is, well, you just might be cynical enough to work
 

 
on Wall Street.

Who We Are

XYZ: I
 

 
think, overall, we feel good about our position in the marketplace…I would say
 

 
that our transformation over the last five to seven years—I came [here] at a time when
 

 
the turnaround had been complete and we identified the fact that we needed to
 

 
be an attraction that people came to us for merchandise, but they also had to
 

 
have an experience that was memorable.

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: We are going to become an entirely new
 

 
class of department store that doesn’t exist today. We are going to create a new category that we
 

 
call the specialty department store and we think it is going to be profound and
 

 
let me tell you about it…

—8/10/12

Our Customer Experience
 
XYZ: So we focused very much on engaging
 

 
our associates and having them be the best ambassadors. I’m pleased to say that our customer
 

 
service scores have been outstanding and lead recent American Express poll
 

 
three years in a row, lead for department stores. I think that is a real testimonial
 

 
to the effectiveness of our sales associates.

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: But
 

 
where we are most excited is how we are going to use RFID to transform the
 

 
customer experience… So next spring we will be rolling out personal check out.
 

 
So in addition to being able to check out from any employee anywhere, any time,
 

 
you will be able to check out by yourself in our stores. And we think customers
 

 
are going to like it and it is going to help our conversion and the customer
 

 
experience.

—8/10/12

Our Technology

XYZ: We
 

 
maintain a $650 million capital expenditure commitment this year primarily on
 

 
digital infrastructure as well as remodels, two new stores, and fixture
 

 
rollouts for our attractions and new initiatives…

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: From a technology perspective…we have overspent on technology as a
 

 
company. Part of that is because we have an extraordinarily complex and an
 

 
abundant number of applications to run the business.

Mike shared
 

 
last January we have 492 unique applications, 88% of them are customized,
 

 
meaning we have done all this hard work internally to make them unique to us
 

 
and the challenge of that is 95% of the money we spend every year, $400 million
 

 
was spent to maintain and support outdated applications, which meant we only
 

 
got to spend about 5% on strategic go forward initiatives.

If you
 

 
think about that, that is $20 million a year out of $400 million going to
 

 
something new to improve the customer experience or ability to manage the
 

 
business and the balance going to maintain outdated legacy systems. That is a
 

 
problem.

—8/10/12

Our Promotional Policy

XYZ: Well, our pricing and promotion is set in
 

 
a year in advance, so we don’t react on a week-to-week basis, but I will say that we
 

 
are well priced; as I said, we’re the lowest priced anchor in the mall and we
 

 
compete head-to-head in the off-mall.

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: In
 

 
2011 our Company ran 590 unique promotions and the average item had 20 to 30
 

 
prices — different prices during the year. And so I figured going to three
 

 
types of prices would be a lot simpler. A great everyday price, some items at a
 

 
month-long better value and then clearance, which we called best price.

—8/10/12

Our Home Business

XYZ: We’ve done very well in luggage, in
 

 
housewares, in the soft home side. We have a very well developed window
 

 
covering business. I think one-third of all windows in the United States have [our]
 

 
window coverings. That’s a tremendous advantage when people are building homes
 

 
and remodeling.

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: And on
 

 
the home thing, just so you know, there is going to be a material change in
 

 
home.

—8/10/12

Our Online Business

XYZ: I’ve said many times we’d been better off
 

 
if we started from scratch the dot-com than trying to change the locomotive’s
 

 
engine while we’re running down the track. So I believe we’ve done a good job
 

 
of understanding the issue, but it has not been easy, and has not been
 

 
accretive to our monthly comps. Having said that, we’ve invested heavily
 

 
because we believe it is a strength and that we have a history of being able to
 

 
ship items to a customer’s home effectively and the customer looks to us for
 

 
that.

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: Yes,
 

 
we have not been performing well online. It is one of our big opportunities.
 

 
Steve Seabolt is here in the front row. Steve took over the online store in
 

 
May, we have uncovered a lot of issues — basic issues. We don’t set up our
 

 
items on time. We had items in our shops that weren’t set up online. Our
 

 
navigation is kind of kludgy at times.

—8/10/12

Our Cost Structure

XYZ: Our expense program, overall, is really
 

 
designed to get us to as competitive as possible of a cost structure. Our
 

 
margins have been – are historically high, so we just need to make sure that
 

 
our cost structure is competitive to get back to double-digit operating profit.

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: Expenses
 

 
— we have talked a lot about this at $900 million. So in 2011 we had $5.1
 

 
billion of expense. Our anticipation is that number will be down by over $900
 

 
million in 2013. And where is that coming from? About $400 million of it is
 

 
coming from our stores. It’s about $350 million coming out of our home office
 

 
and about $150 million coming out of our marketing.

—8/10/12

Our Workforce
 

 
Scheduling System

XYZ: Our workforce utilization, our jTime
 

 
– what we call jTime, which is matching schedules to when the customer is in
 

 
the store, that’s, again, we’ve taken out cost. But at the same time, our
 

 
customer service scores have gone up because we have better staffing when the
 

 
customers actually are in the store and save the expense when obviously there
 

 
is less traffic.

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: So I
 

 
think in many ways our employees are so far ahead of us and they are so tired
 

 
of having to go find a piece of paper to figure out when they should work…

—8/10/12

Our Store
 

 
Merchandising System

XYZ: We have a very sophisticated process that
 

 
allows us to merchandise every store differently even if they’re in the same
 

 
market or in the next community.

—9/7/11.
 

 

JCP: So we
 

 
will have as many distinct shopping choices in our 130,000 square feet as you
 

 
will find in a 1 million square-foot mall, except you won’t have to go from
 

 
check out every time you leave a store, this will be a whole unique
 

 
environment…

—8/10/12

Those readers with good memories, or long
 

 
experience with JC Penney, or long experience with this virtual column, are
 

 
probably already ahead of the game and know that both XYZ and JCP are one and
 

 
the same: JC Penney.

Or “JCP.”
 
Take your pick. Either way, will
 

 
the new JC Penney “transformation” work any better than the previous one?

If it does, Ron Johnson really is a
 

 
genius. If it doesn’t, well, at least he
 

 
tried a whole lot harder than the last crew.

Jeff Matthews

Author “Secrets in Plain
 

 
Sight: Business and Investing Secrets of Warren Buffett”

(eBooks on Investing,
 

 
2012) Available now at Amazon.com

© 2012 NotMakingThisUp,
 

 
LLC

The content contained in
 

 
this blog represents only the opinions of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Matthews also acts as an advisor and
 

 
clients advised by Mr. Matthews may hold either long or short positions in
 

 
securities of various companies discussed in the blog based upon Mr. Matthews’
 

 
recommendations. This commentary in no
 

 
way constitutes investment advice, and should never be relied on in making an
 

 
investment decision, ever. Also, this
 

 
blog is not a solicitation of business by Mr. Matthews: all inquiries will be
 

 
ignored. And if you think Mr. Matthews
 

 
is kidding about that, he is not. The
 

 
content herein is intended solely for the entertainment of the reader, and the
 

 
author.

    60
    0